Contracts can have serious financial and legal consequences. It is important to carefully evaluate an agreement before deciding to conclude it. While a contract can be written or oral, the vast majority of contracts are never written or accepted with a signature. Instead, accepting a contract is usually done by exchanging money for a product or service, such as for example. B the purchase of something in a company. However, when it comes to complex contracts with several conditions, it is preferable to obtain the agreement in writing. In the event of a dispute between the parties to a contract, it is for a court to decide whether the contract is valid, annigable or countervailable. The main difference between invalid and countervailable contracts is that a void contract is not valid from the outset, whereas a countervailable contract is valid in the first place, but may then be invalidated at the option of one of the parties. A countervailable contract is a formal agreement between two parties that cannot be enforceable for a number of legal reasons. Among the reasons that can make a contract questionable are: take a situation similar to that of the previous example. This time, Bob is a minor and had nothing to drink. Bob being a minor, the contract is immediately questionable.
However, as he was not incompetent, the contract is valid. Bob always has the option to keep the contract or withdraw. As a general rule, a party has the right to choose whether it wishes to cancel or validate the transaction. A contract concluded by a minor is often questionable, but a minor can only avoid a contract during his minority status and for a reasonable period after the age of majority. After a reasonable period of time, the treaty is deemed to have been ratified and cannot be circumvented.  Other examples are real estate contracts, lawyers` contracts, etc. Invalid contracts can occur if one of the parties is not able to fully understand the impact of the agreement. For example, a mentally disabled person or a drunk person may not be consistent enough to adequately record the parameters of the agreement, which makes it void.. .