However, there are several important legal effects of a plan that you may not be aware of and that you should consider before agreeing to settle the right to inaction. Some of these effects may be overlooked during litigation and the mediation process. The settlement of a medical fault claim could lead to measures that could lead to revocation or other disciplinary action against your medical license. Even if the insurance company may decide to settle the matter despite your objections, at least most will listen to you and try to follow your request if it is reasonable. Another provision of the Florida Medical Practice Act, Section 458.331 (1) (v), Florida Statutes, would also authorize disciplinary action in a single case if, after reviewing the comparison report (or judgment), the physician found, during the medical board`s assessment, that the physician had performed incompetently or violated existing treatment standards. Of course, the report will have to be reviewed, reviewed and an appropriate legal procedure followed before it can do so. If you or a member of your family may be the victim of medical malpractice committed by a doctor, hospital or other health professional in the United States, you should immediately consult a local medical malpractice lawyer in your state, who may review your right to medical malpractice for you and represent you or your family member. , in a case of medical malpractice. , if necessary. Hiring a separate lawyer to mandate the trial has several advantages. The most important thing is that since you are the one who hires the lawyer, that lawyer represents only your interests and not those of your professional. It will not address so much broader issues that the insurance company may find threatened if it threatens its interests or those of others of its policyholders. This lawyer will inform you of the potential impact on your professional license, which should include a debate on a possible report to the NPDB.
In addition, they may be able to assist in the preparation of resolution measures or other solutions to the dispute that would be more favourable to you. In a D.C. Bar Ethics Opinion, it is said that it is unethical for a lawyer to agree to keep confidential certain public information about a medical malpractice case: « A settlement agreement must not compel the lawyer to remain confidential and not to disclose public information about the case in advertising documents or on law firm websites. , such as the name of the opponent to the allegation set out in the complaint file. , or the fact that the matter is settled.